We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

U.S. Supreme Court upholds fraud-on-the-market doctrine

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • June 25 2014

In its highly anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. released this week, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that

Ontario Court of Appeal addresses important questions for securities class action claims, overrules its prior decision enforcing limitation periods

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 4 2014

In Green v. CIBC, released on February 3, 2014, a specially convened five-judge panel of the Court of Appeal for Ontario addressed important issues

Ontario Court of Appeal decides major securities class actions case changing effect of limitation period and guiding future leave motions

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 3 2014

In a decision released this morning, a specially convened five-judge panel of the Court of Appeal for Ontario provided guidance on issues of

Increasing risk of class actions for mining companies?: NI 43-101 technical reports

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 5 2013

Mining companies are often considered juicy targets by plaintiff's counsel. So it may not come as a surprise that the number of class actions filed

Class members in Ontario securities action can be bound by settlement of parallel U.S. class proceeding

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 20 2013

An Ontario court has just released a welcome decision for issuers who may find themselves defending parallel securities class actions in multiple

Statements of defence required in advance of certification in sino-forest class proceeding

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 3 2012

In the recent Trustees of the Labourers’ Pension Fund et al. v. Sino-Forest decision released March 26, 2012 Justice Perell affirmed his earlier reasoning in Pennyfeather v. Timminco by requiring the delivery of statements of defence before the certification hearing