We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

"My prior complaint was one of the reasons for the adverse employment action": mixed motive theories for retaliation claims under Title VII

  • Akerman Senterfitt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Recently, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, which addresses the causation standard

Looking out for your employees' health - wellness programs

  • Akerman Senterfitt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2012

On August 20, 2012, the Eleventh Circuit held in Seff v. Broward County, Florida that the ADA’s safe harbor provision allows employers to deduct a fee from the paychecks of employees who choose not to participate in a wellness program

The Dukes aftermath

  • Akerman Senterfitt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2012

In June 2011, the Supreme Court rejected the certification of a class of 1.5 million female employees of Wal-Mart Stores, finding that the plaintiffs' claims lacked commonality

NLRB posting rule upheld

  • Akerman Senterfitt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2012

On March 2, 2012, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") lawfully promulgated Subpart A of its Rule, “Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act" which requires employers to post a notice of employee rights