We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Federal Circuit reverses prior opinions to hold that, under Alice, patent does not claim eligible subject matter

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 17 2014

Fed Cir affirms Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal because the patent was invalid under section 101. The claims covered an 11-step method for Internet

EDTX excludes opinions on non-comparable licenses

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2014

On May 9, 2014, Judge Davis of the Eastern District of Texas issued a Daubertopinion in Tracbeam, L.L.C. V. Google, Inc., Case No. 6:13-cv-00093-LED

Supreme Court rules Raging Bull claims not down for the count a follow-up post

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2014

As mentioned in our blog yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Petrella v. MGM. The case raised the issue of whether the equitable

Plaintiff beware: perils of bringing false advertising claims against FDA-regulated products

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 16 2010

Patent litigation cases involving million-dollar blockbuster drugs and medical devices seem to routinely make the news