Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Is lack of a bona fide intent to use a mark “fraud”?
- Fish & Richardson PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 10 2010
Under the Trademark Act, only certain challenges are permitted after five years from the registration date
Implications for trademark owners
- Fish & Richardson PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 10 2010
The Honda decision reaffirms how important it is for trademark applicants, if challenged, to have documentary evidence at the time they file that substantiates their bona fide intent to use the mark in US commerce
Prior case law interpreting the “bona fide intent” standard
- Fish & Richardson PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 10 2010
There have not been many reported decisions involving the "bona fide intent" standard
2009 Honda v. Winkelmann case adds new requirement to demonstrate “ability” to use the mark
- Fish & Richardson PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 10 2010
The Honda case involved an opposition by Honda to an application to register VIC for "vehicles for transportation on land, air or water" and related goods, including "glider aircraft."
Current Search
- Firm Name - Fish & Richardson PC
- Author - Keith A. Barritt
- Workarea - Litigation
- Workarea - Intellectual Property