Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 275

Customer list not secret enough

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 9 2013

An employer was unable to protect the confidentiality of its customer list, because it failed to present any evidence that the list was worthy of

Employee’s hostile conduct was objective basis for personality test

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 13 2013

An employer lawfully required an employee to undergo a psychiatricpsychological fitness-for-duty examination because of his obstreperous conduct

Colorado construction legislation update

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 10 2013

The 2013 Colorado Legislative Session ended on May 8, 2013. Although construction issues were not at the forefront, a few bills pertinent to the

When a manager fails to follow the RIF policy

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 6 2013

An employer recently lost a trial on an age discrimination claim arising from a reduction in Force ("RIF"). The employer lost because the manager

Family feud over affair not retaliation

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

Title VII does not prohibit all favoritism in the workplace. Recently, a sister discovered that her complaints to the family business about her

Member Becker, tear down that poster!

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 8 2013

The NLRB exceeded its authority when it adopted its August 2011 rule requiring employers to post a new Notice informing employees of their rights

Employer has opportunity (or a duty?) to compel mental health exam of plaintiff

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 3 2013

It never seems fair. In lawsuits, employees frequently put their medical condition and history at issue by alleging they are disabled or suffered

Court “baffled” by NLRB’s “interpretive leap”

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 3 2013

The NLRB took an unjustified "interpretive leap" when it found that a hospital President's statement about union negotiations conveyed a threat and

Colorado Civil Union Act

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 2 2013

On March 21, 2013, Governor John Hickenlooper signed the Colorado Civil Union Act ("the Act") into law, authorizing any two unmarried and otherwise

The “Keep Jobs in Colorado Act” bad for business, bad for the state?

Sherman & Howard LLC
-
USA
-
May 7 2013

A new law currently being debated in Colorado's legislature could expose companies working on public projects to civil penalties if their workforce

next >

Search results

Customer list not secret enough

Employee’s hostile conduct was objective basis for personality test

Colorado construction legislation update

When a manager fails to follow the RIF policy

Family feud over affair not retaliation

Member Becker, tear down that poster!

Employer has opportunity (or a duty?) to compel mental health exam of plaintiff

Court “baffled” by NLRB’s “interpretive leap”

Colorado Civil Union Act

The “Keep Jobs in Colorado Act” bad for business, bad for the state?

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea