We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, No. 09-291 (U.S. Jan. 24, 2011), the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided that Title VII supports so-called third-party retaliation claims, when an employer retaliates against - not the person who engaged in protected activity - but a third party. In Thompson, an employee and his fiancé both worked for the same employer
