We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 274

Employee’s hostile conduct was objective basis for personality test

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

An employer lawfully required an employee to undergo a psychiatricpsychological fitness-for-duty examination because of his obstreperous conduct

Colorado construction legislation update

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

The 2013 Colorado Legislative Session ended on May 8, 2013. Although construction issues were not at the forefront, a few bills pertinent to the

Customer list not secret enough

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

An employer was unable to protect the confidentiality of its customer list, because it failed to present any evidence that the list was worthy of

Member Becker, tear down that poster!

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The NLRB exceeded its authority when it adopted its August 2011 rule requiring employers to post a new Notice informing employees of their rights

The “Keep Jobs in Colorado Act” bad for business, bad for the state?

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

A new law currently being debated in Colorado's legislature could expose companies working on public projects to civil penalties if their workforce

When a manager fails to follow the RIF policy

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

An employer recently lost a trial on an age discrimination claim arising from a reduction in Force ("RIF"). The employer lost because the manager

New Form I-9, mandatory May 7, 2013 for all employers

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

Beginning May 7, 2013 employers throughout the nation will be required to use a new Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. The new I-9 is

Court “baffled” by NLRB’s “interpretive leap”

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

The NLRB took an unjustified "interpretive leap" when it found that a hospital President's statement about union negotiations conveyed a threat and

Employer has opportunity (or a duty?) to compel mental health exam of plaintiff

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

It never seems fair. In lawsuits, employees frequently put their medical condition and history at issue by alleging they are disabled or suffered

Let the seller beware: hospitals treating HMO patients employed by the federal government are “subcontractors” governed by affirmative action laws

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

When a health planHMO ("Plan") provides group health coverage to employers, including the federal government, the hospitals that treat federal