We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,880

$8 million penalty for weak ITAR compliance: how the price of maintenance beats the cost of repair

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April, 30, 2013, Raytheon Company, a major military electronics and weapons manufacturer, agreed with the U.S. Department of State to pay $8

New “beast” rules lessen the export control burden

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April 16, 2013, the U.S. Departments of State and Commerce published the first in a series of final rules, amending the International Traffic in

OFAC gets hot, bothered on Iran and Cuba: how economic sanctions work today

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • Cuba, Iran, USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

People who practice U.S. economic sanctions law like to talk about how sanctions are policy-oriented, or an engine of U.S. foreign policy. Whereas

U.S. sanctions target Russian corruption, human rights violations

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • Russia, USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

Asserting that "the protection of human rights is not left exclusively to the internal affairs of any one country," in December 2012 the

Federal jury finds executive recruiter guilty stealing trade secrets from former employer in order to start competing business

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

On April 24, 2013, a federal jury in the Northern District of California found former KornFerry International corporate executive recruiter, David

District Court grants motion to compel against SEC, holding that "facts" are not work product in SEC confidential witness interviews

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In a recent Securities & Exchange Commission ("SEC") investigation, the SEC interviewed three persons who had proffer agreements with the SEC and

California commercial building owners must comply with new energy use disclosure rules commencing July 1, 2013

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The long-awaited energy use disclosure requirements, first enacted as AB 1103 (Saldana) in 2007 (codified as California Public Resources Code, 25402

First Department upholds Commercial Division decision striking parties' answer and entering default judgment as a sanction for discovery violations

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

In Suffolk P.E.T. Mgt., LLC v. Anand, 2013 NY Slip Op 02335 (First Dep't April 4, 2013), the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed an Order

Transfer $8 million out of accounts in New York? That action alone is not sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

In Henkel v. Masiero, Index No. 6504252012 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cnty. Mar. 18, 2013) (the "Opinion"), the Supreme Court (J. Bransten) granted the

Playing cards with a government that stacks the deck - D.C. District Court radically expands the "Christian doctrine" to subcontracts

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

On March 30, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision imposing certain socio-economic contract requirements on