We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
As readers may be aware, in May 2011, Judge Goldsmith of the San Francisco County Superior Court (Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. California Air Resources Board, et al., Case No. CPF-09-509562) found that the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) analysis of project alternatives in its AB 32 Scoping Plan was not sufficient under CEQA
A Court of Appeal recently ruled that a city council resolution certifying an addendum to an EIR need not separately state that a water supply assessment (WSA) was approved where the addendum discusses and incorporates the WSA
Current Search
Firm Name - Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
