We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

English High Court accepts incorporation of terrorism exclusion clause in PPL policy

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2010

In Axa Corporate Solutions SA v National Westminster Bank Plc & Marsh Ltd 2010 EWHC 1915 (Comm) Axa sought a declaration by the Court that a terrorism exclusion clause had been incorporated into its renewal of a public and products liability (PPL) policy with RBS, of which NatWest is a group company

High Court sides with FSA in judicial review regarding payment protection insurance

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 26 2011

In a judgment handed down on 20 April 2011, the High Court dismissed a judicial review application made by the British Bankers Association (BBA) against complaints handling rules relating to the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI

The challenge against the FSA’s PPI policy falls at the first hurdle

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 7 2011

In a judgment handed down in April of this year, the High Court dismissed a judicial review application made by the British Bankers Association (BBA) and Nemo Personal Finance Limited (Nemo) against complaints handling rules relating to the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI