We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 223

Massachusetts federal court rules that insurer’s decision to commence rescission action does not waive attorney-client privilege

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

Insurers can take comfort that their decision to bring a rescission action against a Massachusetts insured will not itself effect a waiver of the

Massachusetts High Court rules that Federal Arbitration Act applies to contracts involving interstate commerce

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2013

In a decision that has implications for reinsurance, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last week decided that the Federal Arbitration Act

Bed bugs the next big bug for business interruption insurers?

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 29 2010

Bed bugs are quickly becoming the bug du jour

Upstream insurers see losses from Gulf oil spill but continue business

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 12 2010

According to a recent Dow Jones News Service article, leading insurance companies have recently stated that they do not expect the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf to be a catastrophic event for the so-called "upstream" insurance market

United States Solicitor General: the convention is not preempted by the McCarran-Ferguson Act

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2010

As our readers know, we have been following the developments in Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen Self Insured Fund v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al., No. 09 945, a case under consideration for certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court that concerns whether Article II of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, as implemented by Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti preemption provision of the McCarran Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. 1011, et seq

Faulty work deemed an "occurrence" under GCL policy

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2011

Over the years, swimming pools have given rise to more than their share of reported decisions

Massachusetts Federal Court shows little patience for poorly-pled Exchange Act claims

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

D&O issuers and policyholders concerned about their exposure to Exchange Act claims for overly optimistic wind-energy deals may be breathing easier in the wake of a Massachusetts federal district court's holding that a pension fund could not state a viable cause of action against American Superconductor

Alleged mutual fund kickback case allowed to proceed as class action

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2012

Financial lines insurers may want to take a closer look at revenue-sharing agreements between pension plan administrators and the mutual funds they offer plan participants as investment options, in the wake of a Connecticut federal court’s decision to certify a class action against ING Life Insurance & Annuity Company

Wisconsin court: “negligent misrepresentation” claims by molestation victims against archdiocese are not covered under CGL policy

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2010

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals recently ruled that "negligent misrepresentation" claims against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee arising from alleged molestation by priests are not covered under the Archdiocese's CGL policy

Fourth Circuit declares “direct contributing properties” unambiguous in context of CBI coverage

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2014

In a 2-1 decision released on February 20, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court below and declared that the