We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 145

Anti-Monopoly Law: Draft Provisions on Anti-Monopolistic Pricing published for public comment

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • October 12 2009

On August 12, 2009, the National Development and Reform Commission released the Draft Provisions on Anti-Monopolistic Pricing (the "Anti-Monopolistic Pricing Draft") for public comment

Revised Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification thresholds for 2013

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2013

On January 10, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) reporting thresholds under which transactions will

The European Commission’s Intel decision

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • December 10 2009

On May 13, 2009, the European Commission (the “Commission”) published a summary of a decision confirming its view that Intel Corporation was guilty of serious anti-competitive conduct during a period from 2002-2007 in an important microprocessor market and, consequently, the Commission imposed a massive 1.06 billion fine on Intel

Whistleblowing and dawn raids - sportswear giants at it again

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 11 2009

On 10 September 2009 the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) dawn-raided the offices of Sports Direct

The best from Brussels: European Best Practice Guidelines welcomed as companies are given step-by-step guide to European Commission antitrust investigations

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 9 2010

On January 6, 2010, the European Commission published for consultation Best Practice Guidelines on the conduct of antitrust proceedings and guidance on the procedures of hearing officers in antitrust proceedings

The federal antitrust agencies move closer to updating the horizontal merger guidelines

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2010

On September 22, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division, Department of Justice (Antitrust Division) announced their intent to examine whether the Horizontal Merger Guidelines (Guidelines) -- used by the agencies in evaluating mergers and acquisitions involving competitors -- should be updated

The European Commission’s Intel decision

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • December 7 2009

On May 13, 2009, the European Commission (the “Commission”) published a summary of a decision confirming its view that Intel Corporation was guilty of serious anti-competitive conduct during a period from 2002-2007 in an important microprocessor market and, consequently, the Commission imposed a massive 1.06 billion fine on Intel

Will Competition Commissioner Almunia prove to be a man of steel?

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 9 2010

On November 27, 2009, EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso announced the new line up of EU Commissioners for the next five year term

The quandary over quantum: does European Commission’s new study on quantifying antitrust damages shed any light on the issue?

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 9 2010

In July 2008 the European Commission launched a tender for research into calculating so-called "quantum," the figure that can be allocated to the financial impact of anti-competitive behavior

First UK follow-on damages decision uses strict application of causation principles for antitrust violations

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 9 2010

In late December 2009, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) handed down judgment in the first ever follow-on private damages action to reach trial and judgment in the UK, for a violation of UKEuropean competition law ("the Enron decision"