We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

In Justice Stevens’ final antitrust opinion, Supreme Court rules that NFL’s joint licensing arrangements are subject to the rule of reason

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2010

Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court in the May 24 decision in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, et al., No. 08-661, the Court’s retiring antitrust scholar Justice John Paul Stevens declared that the collective licensing activities of member teams of the National Football League (“NFL”) constitute concerted action that is not immune from antitrust scrutiny under Section 1 of the Sherman Act as that of a “single entity.”

Supreme Court unanimously finds NFL’s joint licensing activities are subject to antitrust rule of reason

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 26 2010

In the valedictory antitrust opinion of Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by all eight other justices, the Supreme Court held on May 24, 2010 in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, et al., No. 08-661 that collective licensing activities of member teams of the National Football League (NFL) constitute concerted action that is not immune from antitrust scrutiny as that of a “single entity” and therefore must be evaluated to determine whether it constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade under Section 1 of the Sherman Act