We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 705

What elephant? Supreme Court downplays inquiry into patent strength in Hatch-Waxman settlements

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

The Supreme Court held today in FTC v. Actavis that so-called "reverse payment" settlement agreements are subject to antitrust law's "rule of reason"

Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter: Supreme Court defers to arbitrator’s interpretation that contract authorized class arbitration

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

On June 10, 2013, a unanimous Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. ___ (2013), held that an arbitrator's decision to allow

IRS releases new version of Form 720 for certain health plans to report and pay PPACA imposed fee

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") recently posted a revised version of Form 720 that applicable self-insured health plans should use to report

Final HHS rule delays implementation of some SHOP provisions

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") recently released a final rule related to the Small Business Health Options Program ("SHOP"

Kim Dotcom’s plea for helpthreatening to sue Facebook, Google, and Twitter over claimed security patent

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

Internet tycoon Kim Dotcom recently claimed via Twitter that he is the inventor and patent-holder of a two-step authentication method employed by

Has another wave of “say-on-pay” litigation come to an end?

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2013

In 2010 and 2011, after the enactment of federal “say-on-pay” legislation in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,1

First Circuit holds Rule 9(b) does not apply to the FCA’s first-to-file rule

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

The First Circuit recently deepened a circuit split in holding that complaints filed under the False Claims Act's first-to-file rule do not need to

Departments release final rules on workplace wellness programs under the Affordable Care Act

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2013

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury (the "Departments") jointly released final rules regarding nondiscriminatory

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Owner who leased land to company and worked as an independent contractor for an unrelated entity held personally liable for company’s withdrawal liability

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 4 2013

Nagy Ready Mix (the "Company") withdrew from a multiemployer pension plan after the Company ceased employing workers covered by a collective