We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-9 of 9

NLRB: board’s aggressive agenda unabated: required notice, rulemaking, social media, and the Boeing case

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2011

As promised, Part 2 of our NLRB Roundup1 takes a step back from the case law summarized in Part 1 to address other issues surrounding the current Board and its effect on the labor law landscape

NLRB social media status update: is the board sending employers a friend request?

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2011

Since the famous “Facebook firing” complaint in late 2010, many observers have worried that the majority-Democrat National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or the “Board”) social media focus was an attempt to establish pro-union, anti-employer precedent, giving employees free rein to disparage and criticize their employers online

NLRB roundup Part 1: Obama Board continues apace reversing Bush Board decisions, expanding labor laws

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2011

Since our last summary, the Obama Board has taken significant steps to further outgoing Chairman Liebman’s stated goal of bringing the Board “back to life after a long period of dormancy”

NLRB roundup: a year in review, and a look ahead

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2013

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") began 2013 as it began 2012, facing questions regarding whether a quorum of its members had

NLRB delays notice posting rule’s effective date

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2011

On December 23, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced that it would postpone its requirement that employers post a notice informing employees of their federal labor law rights until April 30, 2012

NLRB halts implementation of new election rules: vote on NLRB election rules lacked quorum, judge rules

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

On May 15, 2012, a federal district court judge for the District of Columbia struck down recent changes to the National Labor Relations Board’s representation election procedures, which were intended to streamline the Board’s representation election process

Court upholds NLRB adoption of notice posting rule but limits sanctions

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2012

On March 2, 2012, a federal district court in Washington, D.C. upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s authority to adopt a proposed regulation requiring employers to post a notice informing employees of their federal labor law rights

NLRB suspends implementation of notice posting rule pending legal challenges

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

On April 17, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision enjoining the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) from implementing a controversial rule requiring employers to post a notice informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”

NLRB roundup: more frequent and significant action from Obama appointees

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2011

The Obama National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has started to make its mark on the labor laws through a series of changes that collectively may have a significant impact on the labor law environment