We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-9 of 9

NLRB delays notice posting rule’s effective date

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2011

On December 23, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced that it would postpone its requirement that employers post a notice informing employees of their federal labor law rights until April 30, 2012

NLRB: board’s aggressive agenda unabated: required notice, rulemaking, social media, and the Boeing case

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2011

As promised, Part 2 of our NLRB Roundup1 takes a step back from the case law summarized in Part 1 to address other issues surrounding the current Board and its effect on the labor law landscape

NLRB social media status update: is the board sending employers a friend request?

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2011

Since the famous “Facebook firing” complaint in late 2010, many observers have worried that the majority-Democrat National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or the “Board”) social media focus was an attempt to establish pro-union, anti-employer precedent, giving employees free rein to disparage and criticize their employers online

NLRB roundup: more frequent and significant action from Obama appointees

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2011

The Obama National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has started to make its mark on the labor laws through a series of changes that collectively may have a significant impact on the labor law environment

Employers’ eye on the court: the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a host of employment-related cases during its current term

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2010

The US Supreme Court began its new 2010-2011 term on October 4, 2010 with a number of employment-related cases on the docket, many of which have already been orally argued, that could potentially impact employers concerning such matters as arbitration, retaliation, immigration, and employee benefits

Federal government implements pro-union notice requirement for government contractors

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 9 2010

Government contractors and subcontractors now have a new, unsavory obligation

Time for recess: Becker, Pearce appointed to NLRB

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2010

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") is finally moving towards its full complement of five members

Employers beware: unions win battle in war over e-mail use

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2009

With the advent of information technology, union supporters have frequently used employer e-mail systems to solicit support during union organizing campaigns

Supreme Court holds that employees under collective bargaining agreement are blocked from going to court on age discrimination claims, must arbitrate instead

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2009

In 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, a decision with significant practical ramifications for unionized employers, the United States Supreme Court, on April 1, 2009, held that employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement were required to arbitrate claims of age discrimination under the arbitration clause of that agreement instead of allowing them to sue in Court