We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Garfield and the puzzling negotiation that resolved a labor inefficiency claim

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

Lasso in hand, Garfield stood stoically up against the magnificent Saguaro Cactus, its five arms towering above him. The scorching desert sun beat

Billing with no intention of payment

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

In GaN Corporation, ASBCA No. 57834, 2012 WL 2997037, a contractor appealed a government claim alleging contracting overcharging on a contract for

Four minutes to protect your company from age discrimination

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 15 2013

Age Discrimination can be a big money risk for companies who terminate workers 40 or older. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA

Project labor agreements

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

A recent decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court looked like a setback for use of project labor agreements on publicly bid work

NLRB "rights notice"

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2012

On April 17, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit enjoined an NLRB rule that was scheduled to go into effect for "all employers" on April 30, 2012

Pay-if-paid provision negated

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2012

It is the sign of the times, contractors routinely try to avoid solely bearing the burden of non-payment