We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 164

Discretionary protection - state bonding requirements in P3 projects

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2014

Public-private partnerships ("P3s") have become an increasingly popular procurement method for public projects. P3s refer to the partnership between

President Obama issues new Executive Order requiring reporting of labor law violations

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

A new Executive Order issued on July 31, 2014 by President Obama will require federal contractors to disclose past noncompliance with a series of

A primer on the Miller Act's federal bonding requirements

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

If you have ever been involved with a federal construction projecteither as a contractor, subcontractor, supplier, or suretyyou have

Minimize the inherent risk in “scope bidding” by amending your form subcontract

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

Subcontractors must exercise particular care if the project specifications are performance specifications or otherwise described by so-called "scope"

Common sense contracting - summer 2014

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

One of the most important risk-shifting devices in a construction contract is the indemnification provision because it protects one party from

Contract's notice provision bars claim for extra work

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

The United States Court of Federal Claims recently held that a contractor's claim for additional compensation for a change should be denied because

Anti-indemnification statutes and their impact upon insuring indemnification obligations versus those of an additional insured

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

Construction projects are inherently risky endeavors. A myriad of things that can go wrong range from damaging a tree on neighboring property, to the

An overview of the difference between indemnity obligations and obligations to provide additional insured coverage

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

One of the most important risk-shifting devices in a construction contract is the indemnification provision because it protects one party from

ISO 2013 additional insured endorsements revisions - what the construction industry needs to do

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

New risks associated with recent revisions to the standard ISO Additional Insured endorsements language have not been addressed by many in the

Public policy limitations on indemnity for sole or partial negligence

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

Contractors often develop standard contracts for use on a variety of projects, tailored most often to the demands and particular needs of the owner