Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 10
Supreme Court overrules EPA “strong-arming” under Clean Water Act
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 28 2012
The United States Supreme Court recently held that an enforcement order issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Clean Water Act (the “Act”) constituted “final agency action” and that the Act did not preclude judicial review of the order
Indiana Supreme Court requires insurers to pay for environmental cleanup
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 22 2012
The Indiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc. on March 22, 2012
Indiana's Supreme Court considers liability for environmental contamination
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 8 2011
On April 7, 2011, the Indiana Supreme Court issued two important orders regarding environmental law and insurance coverage
Insurers uphill fight on coverage in Indiana
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 6 2011
In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provided insurance companies doing business in Indiana with guidance on how to draft pollution exclusion clausesprovisions typically included in commercial general liability ("CGL") policies that seek to exclude coverage for claims based on environmental contamination
Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action (“ELA”) statute of limitations: 6 years or 10?
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 9 2011
Indiana's Environmental Legal Action ("ELA") statute creates a cause of action to recover costs paid to remediate environmental contamination
Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action statute: court interpretations
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 8 2011
Indiana's Environmental Legal Action statute (the "ELA") allows plaintiffs to bring an environmental legal action against a person that caused or contributed to the release of a hazardous substance or petroleum to recover reasonable costs of cleaning up the contamination
Indiana Court of Appeals clarifies landlord liability for toxic torts
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 7 2010
On November 24, 2010, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in Neal v. Cure
The scope of an environmental professional’s negligence clarified?
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 12 2010
Imagine that you are an environmental professional who has been retained by a purchaser to perform environmental due diligence on an unremarkable piece of commercial property
Seventh Circuit upholds Indiana’s pollution exclusion jurisprudence
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 13 2010
Indiana is known for the tough standards it imposes on insurance companies with respect to withholding coverage based on policy exclusions
Clean Water Act citizen suit against ethanol plant settled
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 10 2010
A U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin recently approved a joint stipulation dismissing a citizen’s suit filed for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act
