We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

Canadian Mounties promise to "get their (harassing) man"

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 15 2013

This last year has seen a number of female Royal Canadian Mounted Police file sexual harassment lawsuits. They claim that their complaints had been

U.S. and multi-national companies engaged in Canadian business operations through controlled Canadian subsidiaries need to stand on guard for possible legislation on interest stripping and other rules

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • December 6 2012

Many U.S. companies engage in business operations in foreign countries, including Canada, through the use of a controlled or wholly owned subsidiary

Transfer pricing decision recently rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada in GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. v. The Queen, 2012 SCC 52

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 4 2012

Last month the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered a unanimious decision in GlaxoSmith Kline, supra

The Quebec Superior Court hands down a significant franchise decision finding a franchisor has an obligation to protect its brand in the face of increased competition

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 30 2012

Mr. Justice Tingley of the Quebec Superior Court recently found Dunkin' Donuts liable for C$16.4MM in damages to 21 of Dunkin's former franchisees

Canadian court rejects retirement age challenge by law firm partner

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 19 2012

We wrote a couple of times recently about the issue of age discrimination when it comes to law firm retirement policies

New technical interpretation issued by Canada Revenue Agency on stock options will spark debate

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • November 8 2011

A recent technical interpretation issued by the Canada Revenue Agency, Technical Interpretation 2011-0393411E5, provides that under Article XV of the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention, that after 2008, when a U.S. resident employee of a Canadian resident corporation acquires shares of the corporation on the exercise of employee stock options, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) would disallow that the income from the taxable amount would qualify for exemption from Canadian income tax under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty, even if the employer was not present in Canada for more than 183 days

Canadian investment in U.S.-based private equity funds: preference for the U.S. limited liability company

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • February 4 2011

Canadians seeking to make investments in US-based private equity funds do face a challenging landscape attributable to the multitude of US taxing authorities, federal, state and local governmental taxing authorities, as well as a somewhat counterintuitive home country tax regime, in reporting their U.S. operations back home in Canada

Canadian Tax Court rules Delaware LLC is U.S. resident for treaty purposes in TD Securities (USA) LLC v. Her Majesty the Queen

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 20 2010

In a detailed and comprehensive review of the US-Canada Income Tax Convention, the recently issued Fifth Protocol, and the OECD Model Treaty and related Commentaries, as well as the domestic tax law treatment of single member limited liability companies, pass through entities and other organization, the Canadian Tax Court, in an opinion written by Patrick Boyle, on April 8, 2010, concluded that implicit in the clear intention of the OECD countries, including Canada and the US, that treaty benefits be enjoyed by TD LLC in the present circumstances, and given the context of the Canadian and US tax régimes and the text of the US Treaty, TD LLC must be considered to be a resident of the US for purposes of the US Treaty otherwise the treaty could not apply