We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 204

PPACA penalties: what individuals without coverage will pay

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 14 2012

As we press forward with implementation of health care reform, one of the things that has not been fully discussed is the penalty for not having “minimum essential coverage.”

Get tested! Non-discrimination and self-funded health plans

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2012

Health care reform has really opened up the flood gates of discussion about discrimination testing

Health care reform and collective bargaining: getting ready for 2014

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

Since PPACA is now the law of the land, we should assume that we will need to continue working toward full compliance

Wellness plans and the ADA safe harbor: Seff v. Broward revisited

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2012

Many plan sponsors are unaware of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act as it relates to health insurance

More on PPACA: multiemployer plans and shared responsibility

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

Earlier this month, Treasury and the IRS published a proposed rule regarding the shared responsibility penalty. The proposed rule describes how the

Be careful who you pay: mistakes may make you pay twice

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2011

Plan administrators have to be careful about making sure they pay the correct beneficiaries and pay the correct amount

To insure or self-insure: that is a good question

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 28 2011

So how does one decide to self-insure a health plan or go the fully-insured route?

The importance of being earnest: why benefit professionals matter

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2012

Over the last few days, I have had various meetings with a number of very good benefit professionals to discuss the state of the union (at least as it relates to employee benefit packages

Withdrawal liability must be actuary's "best estimate"

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2012

When dealing with withdrawal liability, employers frequently question how it is calculated and the answer is usually "by an actuary."

All relationships matter--DOLEBSA releases advisory opinion clarifying "Prohibited Transaction" and "Party in Interest" rules pertaining to brokers providing services

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2011

Dan Kuperstein, an attorney in our Roseland office, brought to my attention that the DOLEBSA has released an Advisory Opinion clarifying "Prohibited Transaction" and "Party in Interest" rules pertaining to brokers providing services to ERISA plans