We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 51

5 more tips for protecting your business from your employees

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Following feedback on his 5 top tips article, Blair Adams has 5 further top tips to protect your business from your employees. Don't give away

Collective redundancy consultation new rules in force from 6 April 2013

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 12 2013

We discussed this at our Breakfast Workshop earlier this week and wanted to set out the change in full. The change affects the consultation period

AIFMD draft Regulations, employment issues relating to portfolio companies

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 4 2013

Under the draft Regulations, when an AIF acquires control of a non-listed company, the AIFM must use its best efforts to ensure that the board of the

Connection with the UK examined again in context of trade union recognition

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Skyshare is an independent trade union

Top 10 tips for protecting your business from its employees

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 12 2012

Many businesses rely heavily on intangible assets such as client and customer relationships, market reputation, confidential plans, accumulated knowledge, genuine secrets and intellectual property

Employment rights for shares: Faustian bargain, gimmick or genuine shift?

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 10 2012

The Chancellor announced this week a scheme that will, from April 2013, allow employees to be given shares in their employer worth between £2,000 and £50,000 and to pay no capital gains tax on any increase in value in those shares, all in return for waiving their rights to claim unfair dismissal, to a statutory redundancy payment, to request flexible working and also, rather strangely, if they agree to give 16 weeks rather than 8 weeks notice of their intention to return from maternity leave

TUPE - organised groupings

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 20 2012

One of the conditions necessary for a service provision change to occur under the TUPE Regulations is that, under Regulation 3

Disciplinary proceedings: can an employee be disciplined twice for the same offence?

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 18 2012

The EAT held in this case that an employer will not necessarily be precluded from conducting second formal disciplinary proceedings against an employee in respect of a matter for which that employee has already been disciplined

TUPE: employee who spent 100 of his time working for a particular client held not to transfer to client when it took activities in house

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 18 2012

Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd & another UKEATS003411BIIn this case the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that Mr Moffat’s employment had not transferred from Ceva to Seawell by way of a service provision change under the TUPE regulations

Pilon clauses: incentivising dishonesty?

  • DMH Stallard LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 18 2012

The Court of Appeal has held that an employee who had his employment terminated on the basis that he would receive a payment in lieu of notice remained entitled to the payment, even though his employer had later discovered his gross misconduct was sufficient to warrant summary dismissal