Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 27

Court looks to Delaware to determine whether patent case should be transferred

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Plaintiff EMC Corporation ("EMC") filed a complaint against Defendant Parallel Iron, L.L.C. ("Parallel Iron") seeking a declaratory judgment of

Allegations of contributory and willful infringement dismissed for failure to state a claim

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Select Retrieval, LLC ("Select") alleges infringement by Defendant Bulbs.com, Inc. ("Bulbs") of U.S. Patent No. 6,128,617 ("the ‘617 patent"

Judge Saylor stays MDL patent infringement case brought by Body Science LLC pending reexamination

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Plaintiff Body Science LLC ("Body Science") filed patent infringement actions against a number of defendants, which have been consolidated for

MGH granted preliminary injunction enjoining former employee from using trademarks

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Following the Court's summary judgment finding that Massachusetts General Hospital ("MGH") owns the marks "Collaborative Problem Solving" and "The

Genzyme allowed to proceed with Lanham Act claim against Shire Human Genetic Therapies but not parent company

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Plaintiff Genzyme Corp. ("Genzyme") brought this action against Defendants Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc. ("Shire HGT") and Shire plc ("Shire"

Judge Woodlock grants summary judgment in favor of patentee on inventorship issues

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

The District Court (Woodlock, D.J.) granted summary judgment confirming the patent-in-suit was not invalid for failure to name a co-inventor and also

Court construes claims in suit between Everyscape, Inc. and Adobe Systems, Inc

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Plaintiff Everyscape filed suit against Defendant Adobe Systems ("Adobe") alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,327,374 ("the ‘374 patent") and

Claims construed in pair of Philips v. Zoll patent cases

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

Philips Electronics North America Corp. and its parent company, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., (collectively, "Philips") filed suit against

Patents concerning reactive power compensations for electric utility systems construed

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
February 15 2013

American Superconductor Corporation ("AMSC") brought suit, claiming that a product of S & C Electric Company ("S&C") infringes AMSC’s patents

Court Identifies USPTO error in patent term adjustment calculations

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
-
USA
-
November 15 2012

The Eastern District of Virginia recently determined in Exelixis, Inc. v. Kappos that the USPTO has been miscalculating Patent Term Adjustment in cases where a Request for Continued Examination was filed after three or more years of pendency

next >