We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18

Patents concerning reactive power compensations for electric utility systems construed

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

American Superconductor Corporation ("AMSC") brought suit, claiming that a product of S & C Electric Company ("S&C") infringes AMSC’s patents

Claims construed in pair of Philips v. Zoll patent cases

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Philips Electronics North America Corp. and its parent company, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., (collectively, "Philips") filed suit against

Court construes claims in suit between Everyscape, Inc. and Adobe Systems, Inc

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Plaintiff Everyscape filed suit against Defendant Adobe Systems ("Adobe") alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,327,374 ("the ‘374 patent") and

Allegations of contributory and willful infringement dismissed for failure to state a claim

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Select Retrieval, LLC ("Select") alleges infringement by Defendant Bulbs.com, Inc. ("Bulbs") of U.S. Patent No. 6,128,617 ("the ‘617 patent"

Judge Saylor stays MDL patent infringement case brought by Body Science LLC pending reexamination

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Plaintiff Body Science LLC ("Body Science") filed patent infringement actions against a number of defendants, which have been consolidated for

Judge Woodlock grants summary judgment in favor of patentee on inventorship issues

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

The District Court (Woodlock, D.J.) granted summary judgment confirming the patent-in-suit was not invalid for failure to name a co-inventor and also

Court looks to Delaware to determine whether patent case should be transferred

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Plaintiff EMC Corporation ("EMC") filed a complaint against Defendant Parallel Iron, L.L.C. ("Parallel Iron") seeking a declaratory judgment of

Federal Circuit clarifies reissue recapture rule in MBO Labs v. Beckton, Dickinson & Co. dispute

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

The Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the District Court (Tauro, J.) granting summary judgment for defendant Becton, Dickinson & Company (“B&D”) on the grounds that certain claims of plaintiff MBO Laboratories, Inc.’s (“MBO”) U.S. Reissue Patent No. 36,885 (the “RE ’885 patent”) were invalid for reissue recapture

Judge Gertner construes scope of patent related to prenatal screening for Down Syndrome

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Perkinelmer, Inc. and its subsidiary (“Perkinelmer”) brought this action against Intema Ltd. (“Intema”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the patent-in-suit is invalid and not infringed

Court rules on numerous motions in patent spat related to LEDs, including motions addressing ownership, inventorship, validity, and enforceability

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

The District Court (Young, D.J.) ruled on more than ten motions, including a motion to dismiss, a motion to clarify claim constructions, and a number of motions for summary judgment filed by both Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (“Rothschild”) and the Defendant Cree, Inc. (“Cree”