We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 26

Gore wins summary judgment of non-infringement in case brought by Millipore

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Millipore Corporation (“Millipore”) brought this action against Defendant W.L. Gore Associates, Inc. (“Gore”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,293,477 (the “’477 patent”), concerning fluid sampling devices and kits comprising of components of same

Bose only wins half the battle on summary judgment regarding patent validity

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Bose Corp. (“Bose”) filed suit against Defendant Lightspeed Aviation, Inc. (“Lightspeed”) alleging that Lightspeed’s Zulu ANR Aviation headsets infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,181,252, entitled “High Compliance Headphone Driving” (the “’252 patent”

District court engages in claim construction of means-plus-function claim

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. (“ARMS”) brought this suit against Defendant Austin Precision Products, Inc. (“Austin”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,845,871

Fenwal Inc. obtains reversal of $15.6 million at the Federal Circuit

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

On June 2, 2010, the Federal Circuit vacated a $15.6 million jury verdict for Haemonetics Corp. (“Haemonetics”) awarded in its lawsuit against Fenwal Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corp. (collectively “Fenwal”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,705,983 (the “‘983 patent”

The district court issues claim construction ruling in patent dispute over device for mounting firearm accessories

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

The District Court (Posnor, D.J.) issued a memorandum and order construing various disputed terms and phrases in the claims of U.S. Patent Number 7,356,152, and ruling on indefiniteness

Computer game creator wins fight to litigate in the Commonwealth, but loses preliminary injunction

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

The District Court (Gorton, D.J.) denied the Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denied the Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction

Judge Young construes patent claims involving headsets

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Bose Corp. (“Bose”) filed suit against Defendant Lightspeed Aviation, Inc. (“Lightspeed”) alleging that Lightspeed’s Zulu ANR Aviation headsets infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,181,252, entitled “High Compliance Headphone Driving” (the “’252 patent”

District court finds personal jurisdiction over defendants in Berklee College of Music, Inc. trademark and copyright lawsuit

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Berklee College of Music, Inc. (“Berklee”) brought this action against Defendants Music Industry Educators, Inc. (“MIE”) and its majority owner John Terrell, alleging trademark and copyright infringement, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices under M.G.L. c. 93A stemming from publication of Berklee’s copyrighted material and trademarks on MIE’s website

District court dismisses trademark infringement and unfair competition claims against Under Armour

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Plaintiff Ruggers, Inc. (“Ruggers”) brought this action against defendants United States of America, Rugby Football Union, Ltd. (“USA Rugby”) and various other clothing vendors including Under Armour, Inc. (“Under Armour”), alleging inter alia false advertising and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and unfair competition under M.G.L. c. 93A

Judge Gorton denies preliminary injunction requested by Peoples Federal Savings Bank

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Peoples Federal Savings Bank (“Peoples Federal”) brought suit for trademark infringement and moved for a preliminary injunction against Peoples United Bank (“Peoples United”), claiming that Peoples United had infringed on its Massachusetts-registered marks