We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 48

Trade-marks and product placement: the use of branded products in film and television productions

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 2 2011

In the last issue of the The Cassels Brock Report, I addressed the issue of trade-mark rights in titles as the first in a series of articles on trade-marks in the film and television industries

Continuous use required

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2012

A recent decision of the Trade-marks Opposition Board upheld an opposition on the basis that the applicant had not used the applied-for mark since the date set out in the trade-mark application

Landmark counterfeiting case awards Louis Vuitton and Burberry $2.5 million in damages: Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Singga Enterprises (Canada) Inc

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 28 2011

A recent landmark decision by the Federal Court awarded luxury brands Louis Vuitton and Burberry $2.48 million, the highest amount of damages awarded in a Canadian anti-counterfeiting case

Motor vehicle and bicycle marks

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 2 2011

A recent decision of the Federal Court dismissed an appeal from the Trade-marks Opposition Board that found a mark used with motor vehicles was not confusing with a mark used with bicycles

What’s in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 29 2010

A recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales has provided some interesting comments concerning the use of a competitor's trade marks in comparative price lists

Infringement of design trade-marks

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 21 2011

A recent decision of the High Court of Justice in the United Kingdom provides some useful comments concerning the infringement of design trade-marks

Trade-mark genericism

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • September 21 2011

A recent decision of the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) made interesting comments concerning whether the trade-mark applied for was generic

That's hot: trade-mark rights in catch phrases

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • March 31 2011

In this third instalment of my ongoing series of articles on trade-mark rights in the film and television industries, I deal with trade-mark rights in catch phrases

No-name package causes confusion in the dark

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2012

The Federal Court of Appeal in Canada recently held that a no-name cigarette package depicting registered design trade-marks, but no word mark, was confusingly similar to the word mark MARLBORO which was registered for use in association with cigarettes

Distinctiveness of a colour and shape trade-mark

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 21 2011

The Federal Court of Appeal recently considered the issue of the distinctiveness of a trade-mark consisting of a two-tone colour combination applied to the outside of a disk-shaped inhaler