We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 73

FERC orders addressing the right of first refusal indicate evolving policy

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2012

On July 19, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued a series of orders that show it will take more than simply eliminating rights of first refusal to build transmission facilities from FERC tariffs to level the playing field for new transmission developers to get into the game

FERC denies new Harquahala sale

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2013

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has denied a petition to sell the 1,054 MW New Harquahala gas-fired generating station in Arizona to Saddle

FERC issues order clarifying certain electric quarterly report requirements

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

On April 18, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") issued an order on rehearing and clarification of its September 2012 Final Rule

FERC issued Order No. 773-A on rehearing and clarification of NERC bulk electric system definition and exceptions process under rules of procedure

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

In its Order No. 773-A, issued April 18, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission denied in part and granted in part requests for rehearing

FERC issues unusual tolling order on ITC Holdings Corp.Entergy merger filing

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2013

In an unusual procedural move, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") today issued an order tolling the time for action on ITC Holdings

FERC initiates investigation into MISO transmission owners' formula rate protocols

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2012

In an order issued May 17, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") initiated an investigation and established paper hearing procedures to determine whether the formula rate protocols under the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. ("MISO"

Court doubts FERC jurisdiction to police NYMEX trades

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 preserved the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's exclusive jurisdiction over futures transactions on commodity

FERC affirms grid-wide cost allocation in PJM

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2012

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's March 30, 2012, order approving PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.'s plan to recover the costs of new transmission lines rated above 500 kV using the "postage stamp" method provides the first insight into how the agency is likely to evaluate the cost allocation plans that transmission owners are required to file under Order 1000

FERC issues order addressing PJM interconnection's Order No. 1000 compliance filing

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

In an order issued March 22, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") addressed the Order No. 1000 compliance filings by PJM

FERC sets New England Transmission Owners’ return on equity for hearing based on changed market conditions

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 4 2012

In an order issued May 3, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) set for investigation, trial-type hearing, and settlement judge procedures a complaint filed by an ad hoc group of the state regulatory commissions of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, the Massachusetts and Connecticut Attorneys General, and certain state consumer advocate agencies, municipalities, trade associations, and industrial companies located in New England (“Complainants”) against the New England transmission-owning utilities (“New England Transmission Owners”) asserting that the currently-effective return on equity (“ROE”) for the New England Transmission Owners collected through the Independent System Operator of New England’s (“ISO-NE”) Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”) is unjust and unreasonable (although the complaint was also filed against ISO-NE, FERC dismissed ISO-NE as a party because it operates only as the billing agent for the New England Transmission Owners and does not collect its own ROE