Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-8 of 8
Google and Rosetta Stone settle AdWords trademark infringement suit
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- October 31 2012
Six months after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Rosetta Stone’s trademark infringement lawsuit against Google, the parties issued a joint statement today announcing that they have settled their legal dispute
Legal challenge to ICM registry’s and ICANN’s .xxx gtld continues what are the implications for other gTLD applicants?
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- August 20 2012
As we reported in December, two adult entertainment companies filed suit in federal district court in Los Angeles against the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and ICM Registry, the sole operator of the .XXX domain name registry
Fourth Circuit resurrects Rosetta Stone’s challenge to Google’s AdWords program
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 11 2012
On Monday, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision ending Rosetta Stone’s trademark infringement case against Google
Letters of protest: a tool to avoid the “trademark bully” label
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- March 14 2012
Thanks to DuetsBlog for providing an update on the EAT MOR CHIKIN v. EAT MORE KALE dispute that was the subject of our prior post
Who owns a company’s twitter account (and musings on social media and trademarks)?
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- January 31 2012
As alleged in the complaint in PhoneDog LLC v. Kravitz, PhoneDog operates a website that offers cellphone news and reviews and Kravitz was hired as a product reviewer and video blogger
Use the UDRP to reclaim that trademarked domain name? Maybe not.
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- November 16 2011
UDRP proceedings are often touted as a quick and inexpensive way to resolve domain name disputes. Several recent UDRP decisions denying relief to trademark owners, however, demonstrate that in some instances the UDRP may not be the appropriate tool
17 U.S.C. Sec. 505 means what it says: attorney’s fees award to prevailing party discretionary
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- October 18 2011
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides that, in a copyright infringement action, the court may “in its discretion” award costs to a prevailing party
Google AdWords decision in Europe: trademark owners may prevent competitors from using trademarks as keywords
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- European Union
- -
- September 27 2011
Remember last year when the European Union’s Court of Justice ruled that Google did not violate European Union law by selling trademarks as keywords and thereby permitting advertisers to purchase and use keywords corresponding to their competitor’s trademarks in Google ads?
Current Search
- Firm Name - Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- Workarea - Litigation
- Author - Geri L. Haight