We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
The Appellate Division’s recent decision in Liss v. Federal Insurance Co. (February 3, 2009) highlights some of the important consequences that flow from a court’s decision whether to characterize a minority shareholder’s claim as a breach of contract or a breach of fiduciary duty by the majority shareholder
