We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,482

First business method patent struck down by PTAB

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

As discussed previously, the very first petition for a Covered Business Method Patent Challenge (CBM) was filed on September 16th by SAP

PTAB amendment procedures trip up patentees

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2013

The rules of the new patentability trials of the America Invents Act (AIA) are designed to ensure timely resolution within the statutorily mandated 12

Federal Circuit reverses in InterDigital Communications appeal (2012-1628)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2013

On June 7, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in InterDigital Communications, LLC v. ITC (2012-1628). This was an appeal by InterDigital

ALJ Gildea denies motion to stay in Certain Microelectromechanical Systems (“MEMS Devices”) (337-TA-876)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

On May 31, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 6 (dated May 21, 2013) in Certain Microelectromechanical Systems ("MEMS

Congress considers reformulation of business method patent definition

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 4 2013

One of the more intriguing mechanisms of the America Invents Act (AIA) is the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method (CBM) Patents. To date

E.T. Radcliffe and EMIR Tiar file new 337 complaint regarding certain TV programs, literary works for TV production and episode guides

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

On June 7, 2013, E.T. Radcliffe, LLC of Dallas, Texas ("Radcliffe") and Emir Tiar of Coto De Caza, California ("Tiar") (collectively, the

Protective orders & new AIA post grant patent realities

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

A standard component of any patent litigation is a protective order. Such orders will invariably include a “prosecution bar. ” The prosecution bar

ITC issues limited exclusion order and cease and desist order after finding violation of Section 337 in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (337-TA-794)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

On June 4, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless

ALJ Pender denies motion seeking to preclude evidence in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Tablet Computers (337-TA-847)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2013

On May 29, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 18 (dated May 28, 2013) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Tablet

ALJ Shaw issues notice of initial determination in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide And Parental Control Technology (337-TA-845)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2013

On June 7, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued a notice regarding the Initial Determination ("ID") in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy