We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 67

ALJ Gildea denies respondents’ motion for summary determination in Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (337-TA-853)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On May 7, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 29 (dated April 17, 2013) denying Respondents LG Electronics, Inc. and LG

ALJ Shaw issues public version of rulings on discovery motions in Certain Video Analytics Software (337-TA-795)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

On April 23, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order No. 21 and Order No. 25 (dated April 16, 2012 and June 21, 2012

ALJ Bullock issues public version of remand determination finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Automated Media Library Devices (337-TA-746)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

On April 23, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of the Remand Initial Determination (the "Remand ID") (dated March 26

ALJ Shaw denies motion to terminate investigation in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2012

On June 20, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public version of Order No. 29 (dated May 31, 2012) denying Respondents Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s (collectively, “Nokia”) motion to terminate the investigation in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-800

ALJ Essex grants-in-part motion for protective order limiting e-discovery in certain electronic imaging devices (337-TA-850)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2012

On November 19, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 12 granting-in-part Complainant FlashPoint Technology, Inc.’s (“FlashPoint”) motion for a protective order to limit the discovery of electronically stored information in Certain Electronic Imaging Devices (Inv. No. 337-TA-850

ITC issues opinion in certain video game systems (337-TA-770)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2012

On November 6, 2012, the International Trade Commission issued an opinion in Certain Video Game Systems and Wireless Controllers and Components Thereof (337-TA-770) construing the term “toy wand” and remanding the case to Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock to determine infringement in light of the Commission’s construction

ALJ Shaw denies motions for summary determination in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

On March 21, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order Nos. 92, 93, and 99 in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and

Lamina packaging files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Laminated Packaging Products

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

On February 20, 2013, Lamina Packaging Innovations LLC of Longview, Texas ("Lamina") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an

ALJ Gildea issues claim construction order in certain portable electronic devices (337-TA-797)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2012

On July 23, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 57 (dated June 26, 2012) construing the disputed terms of the asserted claims in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

Did you knowParties may request a shortened period during which opposition motions may be filed?

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2012

Investigations at the ITC already move very quickly, but did you know that the parties can make investigations move even more rapidly?