We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 36

ALJ Essex grants motion for protective order regarding the scope of discovery in Certain 3G Mobile Handsets (337-TA-613)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

On September 17, 2014, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 50 (dated August 21, 2014) granting Complainants InterDigital

ALJ Gildea rules on motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices with Graphics Data Processing Systems (337-TA-813)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 27 2012

On April 20, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated April 9, 2012) denying Complainants’ S3 Graphics, Co., Ltd and S3 Graphics, Inc. (collectively, “S3G”) motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-813

ITC affirms ALJ Bullock’s finding of no violation of Section 337 in Certain Static Random Access Memories (337-TA-792)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

On June 7, 2013, the International Trade Commission ("the Commission") issued a notice in Certain Static Random Access Memories and Products

ALJ Shaw issues recommended determination on remedy and bond in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide And Parental Control Technology (337-TA-845)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2013

On July 3, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public version of his recommended determination ("RD") on remedy and bond (dated June 13, 2013) in

ALJ Rogers denies motion to disqualify in certain light-emitting diodes (337-TA-798)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

On April 27, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated January 26, 2012) denying Complainant Samsung LED Co., Ltd.’s motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc.’s expert witness, Dr. Wetzel, and bar his access to confidential business information in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-798

ITC vacates initial determination finding no domestic industry in Certain Optical Disc Drives (337-TA-897)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2014

On September 3, 2014, the International Trade Commission ("Commission") issued anotice in Certain Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and

ALJ Shaw denies motions for summary determination in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

On March 21, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order Nos. 92, 93, and 99 in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and

ALJ Shaw denies motion to postpone evidentiary hearing in certain microprocessors (337-TA-781)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2012

On June 12, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 34 in Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-781

Lamina packaging files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Laminated Packaging Products

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

On February 20, 2013, Lamina Packaging Innovations LLC of Longview, Texas ("Lamina") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an

Nokia files new 337 complaint regarding certain electronic devices, including mobile phones and tablet computers

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2012

On May 2, 2012, Nokia Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and Intellisync Corporation of Sunnyvale, California (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337