We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On appeal of a TTAB decision cancelling a federal registration on likelihood-of-confusion grounds, the district court found that the TTAB erred in considering the actual nature of the parties' goods, believing it should have confined its analysis to the goods as identified in the registrations
Current Search
Firm Name - Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
