Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18

Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
March 30 2012

Triumph Learning LLC (“Applicant”) filed use-based trademark applications for the mark COACH in various formats

Frito-Lay N. AM., Inc. v. Princeton Vanguard, LLC, Opp. No. 91195552, Canc. No. 92053001 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2012

Applicant filed a motion to compel certain electronically stored information (“ESI”) from Opposer

Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc., 101 U.S.Q.P.2d 1089 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2012

Respondent failed to timely respond to Petitioner’s discovery requests on multiple occasions, including in violation of two TTAB orders

Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Fage Dairy Processing Indus. S.A., Opp. nos. 91118482, 91118950, 91155075, 91182937 (TTAB Sept. 14, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
November 2 2011

Applicant filed fifteen applications to register various design marks containing the mark TOTAL for yogurt, among other products

Nike, Inc. v. Maher, Opp. No. 91188789 (TTAB Aug. 9, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
September 12 2011

Applicants applied to register the mark JUST JESU IT for various types of athletic apparel

Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc., 98 USPQ2d 1633 (TTAB May 5, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
July 21 2011

The TTAB stated that it will take an active role in the pretrial management of cases that have the potential to become overly contentious or generate voluminous records

In re Kysela Pere et Fils, Ltd., Ser. No. 77686637 (TTAB Mar. 24, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
June 3 2011

The TTAB affirmed the Examining Attorney's refusal to register the mark HB in standard characters for wine based on a likelihood of confusion with prior registrations for the mark HB with a crown design for beer

Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 26 2011

The Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's dismissal of Citigroup's opposition to the registration of CAPITAL CITY BANK marks based on a likelihood of confusion with Opposer's CITIBANK marks

General Council of the Assemblies of God dba Gospel Publishing House v. Heritage Music Found., Cancellation No. 92051525 (ttab feb. 3, 2011)

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
February 28 2011

General Council of the Assemblies of God dba Gospel Publishing House (“Petitioner”) filed a motion to exclude any testimony offered by Heritage Music Foundation’s (“Respondent”) expert witness under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1) based on Respondent’s alleged failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2

In re Van Valkenburgh

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
January 31 2011

The TTAB affirmed the refusal to register Applicant's product-design mark, finding that there was sufficient evidence of the product design's functionality, including a utility patent, advertising materials touting utilitarian advantages, and evidence of a hindrance to competitors