We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Disney Enters., Inc., 702 F.3d 640 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2012)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2013

For decades, Stephen Slesinger, Inc. (“Slesinger”) and certain Disney entities, including Disney Enterprises, Inc. (“Disney”), have disputed ownership

In re Fox, 2012 WL 6602862 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2012)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2013

Marsha Fox filed an application to register a mark consisting of the wording COCK SUCKER and a design element featuring a drawing of a crowing rooster

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., 685 F.3d 1046 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2012)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2012

Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. (“Nestle”) opposed Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.’s (“Midwestern”) intent-to-use application for the mark WAGGIN’ STRIPS for “pet food and edible pet treats” on grounds of a likelihood of confusion with and dilution of its earlier registered and used mark BEGGIN’ STRIPS for “dog snacks.”

Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2012

Triumph Learning LLC (“Applicant”) filed use-based trademark applications for the mark COACH in various formats

Frito-Lay N. AM., Inc. v. Princeton Vanguard, LLC, Opp. No. 91195552, Canc. No. 92053001 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2011)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2012

Applicant filed a motion to compel certain electronically stored information (“ESI”) from Opposer

Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc., 101 U.S.Q.P.2d 1089 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2011)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2012

Respondent failed to timely respond to Petitioner’s discovery requests on multiple occasions, including in violation of two TTAB orders

Last month at the Federal Circuit - January 2012

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2012

In Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, No. 11-1091 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 1, 2011), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of SJ of invalidity of certain claims of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.’s (“Teva”) U.S. Patent No. RE39,502 (“the ’502 patent”) based on AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP’s (“AstraZeneca”) prior invention under 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(2

Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Fage Dairy Processing Indus. S.A., Opp. nos. 91118482, 91118950, 91155075, 91182937 (TTAB Sept. 14, 2011)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2011

Applicant filed fifteen applications to register various design marks containing the mark TOTAL for yogurt, among other products

Nike, Inc. v. Maher, Opp. No. 91188789 (TTAB Aug. 9, 2011)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2011

Applicants applied to register the mark JUST JESU IT for various types of athletic apparel

In re Kysela Pere et Fils, Ltd., Ser. No. 77686637 (TTAB Mar. 24, 2011)

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 3 2011

The TTAB affirmed the Examining Attorney's refusal to register the mark HB in standard characters for wine based on a likelihood of confusion with prior registrations for the mark HB with a crown design for beer