Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,085

Crowdsourcing 3D printing prior art for preissuance submissions

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 23 2013

In an interesting turn of events, a segment of the 3D printing (3DP) community is leveraging the concept of crowdsourcing to find prior art and file

Will an IPR result in a stay of co-pending litigation?

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 17 2013

Since September 16, 2012, when the procedure became available, challengers have filed 234 requests for inter partes review. In 82 of these filings

Senate bill proposes expansion of post-grant review of business methods

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 15 2013

Last week, Senator Charles Schumer introduced a bill intended to expand the scope of covered business methods eligible for post-grant review under

IPRPGR proceedings: litigation or prosecution?

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 13 2013

IPRPGR proceedings share many similarities with other trial proceedings, such as district court proceedings. Like other traditional trial

A first look: IPR filing and technology trends

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 7 2013

Since the commencement of inter partes review (IPR) back on September 16, 2012, over 200 petitions have been filed. Below is a snapshot of the

Lessons learned from early decisions declining to institute an IPR

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 3 2013

The PTAB has denied petitions for inter partes review in five of its 54 institution decisions (as of April 30, 2013

Five considerations before filing an IPR

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 1 2013

The Basics: IPR is short for inter partes review. IPR is a new trial proceeding conducted by the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). A

Assuaging estoppel concerns: defining "real parties in interest" after the AIA

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

The newly passed America Invents Act (AIA) raised fears among co-defendants in patent infringement lawsuits about the potentially broad scope of the

PTAB denies authorization to file motion to disqualify district court counsel from IPR

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 29 2013

In ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., IPR2013-00179 (JL), Paper 9 (April 16, 2013), the Board denied ScentAir's request to file a motion

Last month at the Federal Circuit - April 2013

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
April 26 2013

In Move, Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance Ltd., No. 12-1342 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2013), the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's decision granting

next >

Search results

Crowdsourcing 3D printing prior art for preissuance submissions

Will an IPR result in a stay of co-pending litigation?

Senate bill proposes expansion of post-grant review of business methods

IPRPGR proceedings: litigation or prosecution?

A first look: IPR filing and technology trends

Lessons learned from early decisions declining to institute an IPR

Five considerations before filing an IPR

Assuaging estoppel concerns: defining "real parties in interest" after the AIA

PTAB denies authorization to file motion to disqualify district court counsel from IPR

Last month at the Federal Circuit - April 2013

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea