We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11

Five lessons for employers from California v. Riley

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

In the waning days of its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in California v. Riley that police officers generally violate the

Reasonable data security: the FTC's guideposts for employers

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 9 2014

The recent ruling by an administrative judge that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must testify about the data security standards it uses to pursue

EEOC files suit against hospital for reviewing applicant’s hospital records

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2012

Blurring the line between employer and provider may be risky business for healthcare institutions

Minnesota federal court restricts employer use of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2012

Increasingly, employers who suffer data breaches from employees are using the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) to trigger federal question jurisdiction and have the dispute heard in federal court

Fourth Circuit joins courts limiting employers' use of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employees

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2012

The federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) allows an employer to bring a civil action against an employee who accesses the employer's computers "without authorization" or in a manner that "exceeds authorized access."

Fourth Circuit joins courts limiting use of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employee

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2012

Although the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is primarily a criminal statute designed to combat hacking, it allows an employer to bring a civil action against an employee who accesses the employer’s computers “without authorization” or in a manner that “exceeds authorized access”

Washington court clarifies pleading requirements for CFAA claims

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

Trade secret disputes increasingly center on an ex-employee copying trade secret information from the former employer’s computer system and using that information to benefit his or her new employer

Michigan Federal Court limits use of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employee

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2012

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act prohibits (among other things) an employee from accessing an employer’s computers “without authorization” or in a manner that “exceeds authorized access.”

Ninth Circuit rules the CFAA requires proof of hacking

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2012

Last week, the Ninth Circuit published its long awaited en banc decision, authored by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, in United States v. Nosal

Minnesota court narrowly interprets the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2012

Recently, a Minnesota federal district court construed the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act narrowly and dismissed an employer’s CFAA claim against three former high-level employees