We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

California Supreme Court clarifies employer meal & rest period duties

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2012

After three years, the California Supreme Court has finally issued its much-anticipated decision regarding how employers must manage meal periods and rest breaks

California Supreme Court applies administrative exemption to claims adjusters

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2012

In the waning days of 2011, a unanimous California Supreme Court gave California employers a holiday present in its long-awaited opinion that diminishes the importance of the outmoded analytical tool known as "the administrativeproduction worker dichotomy" for determining whether employees are properly classified as exempt "administrative" employees for the purposes of wage and hour law

California Supreme Court finds the "administrativeproduction worker dichotomy" not dispositive in determining insurance claims adjusters exempt

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2012

In a long-awaited decision, the California Supreme Court unanimously gave California employers a holiday present in an opinion that follows the majority of federal courts in finding that insurance claims adjusters are exempt administrative employees

What is the duty to "provide" a meal period? Oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 8 2011

The long-awaited oral argument in the seminal meal and rest break decision involving Brinker Restaurant finally occurred today