We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 956

Answers must follow “yellow brick” road of Federal Rules

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

Judge Shadur sua sponte struck certain paragraphs of Defendant’s answer and affirmative defenses for straying from the “yellow brick road” set by the

No personal jurisdiction based upon a passive website and a single advertisement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2012

Judge Pallmeyer granted defendants PSMJ Resources' ("PSMJ") and Oser Communications' ("Oser") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this Lanham Act case involving plaintiff Modern Trade Communications' ("MTC") rights in its Metal Construction News mark for a metal industry trade publication

Is there a first amendment right to lie?

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2010

Can the government proscribe the right to lie about one's own past, particularly where there is no individualized harm?

Pharmaceutical company must defend against private suit brought by class-action firm after sending facsimiles to physicians

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2012

Earlier this year in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that private plaintiffs beleaguered by unwanted telephone solicitations or facsimile advertisements may bring suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in both state and federal courts when the TCPA requirements for telephone solicitations and facsimile advertisements have not been met

SEC conflict minerals rule upheld by the federal district court

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2013

On July 23, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the plaintiffs' challenge of the SEC's conflict minerals rule and

"Oxymoronic" to deny contentions for which you lack knowledge

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 22 2011

In a run-up to the 2012 election, organized labor will be pleased by two proposed rule changes, one by the Office of Labor-Management Standards of Department of Labor (OLMS)and one by the National Labor Relations Board, that will aid Unions in their organizing activities

Domain name squatting to gain leverage can trigger "bad faith intent" in an ACPA claim

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

A required element to sustain a claim under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection (ACPA) (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)) is proof that the

Delaware Chancery enjoins merger for failure to disclose prior investment banking fees

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2011

On December 20, 2010, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a bench ruling enjoining a special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of obtaining stockholder approval of a merger

Religious institutions update: January 2014

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 6 2014

On the heels of controversy surrounding the Internal Revenue Service's treatment of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, the Treasury

No one can stop change: Second District Court of Appeal rejects Sunnyvale West in latest decision on 'baseline' for evaluation of traffic and air quality impacts under CEQA

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2012

Last week, the Second District Court of Appeal issued its decision in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (April 17, 2012) (Case No. B232655), a high profile case involving construction of a light speed rail line connecting downtown Los Angeles to Santa Monica