We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,052

Fair value: a primer

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2013

Disagreements among owners of business enterprises can result in the threat of litigation and frequently in litigation. The litigation can be in the

July 2013 retail patent lit report

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2013

July saw several frequent fliers filed actions Ameranth, ArrivalStar, Arunachalam, Eclipse IP, Clouding IP, Cascades Branding, and UbiComm

Property dispute decided in favor of Missouri Church with Kansas property

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

In Colonial Presbyterian Church v. Heartland Presbytery, Case No. WD 74374, 2012 WL 2378232 (Mo.App. June 26, 2012), the Missouri Court of Appeals ruled that under the neutral principles of law approach, disputed church property was never conveyed in trust to the denomination and, thus, remained with the church

Judge declares legislative attempt to mandate privatization of 29 existing state prisons through proviso in the General Appropriations Act unconstitutional

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2011

In Baiardi v. Tucker, Case No. 2011 CA 1838 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. Sept. 30, 2011), a circuit court in the Second Judicial Circuit held that the appropriations act “proviso, which mandates that the Florida Department of Corrections privatize numerous facilities in a single procurement, is unconstitutional under Article III, Sections 6 and 12 of the Florida Constitution."

Induced infringement claims need not use the word “induce”

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2013

Judge Kocoras denied defendants’ Beissbarth GmbH (“Beissbarth”) and Robert Bosch, GmbH’s (“Bosch Germany”) (collectively “German Defendants”) Fed. R

Reply expert reports must only respond to rebuttal reports

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2013

Judge St. Eve granted in part Defendant’s (collectively “Zurn”) motion to strike plaintiff Sloan Valve’s (“Sloan”) reply expert report in this patent

Expert testimony required for one infringement issue

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

Judge Lefkow granted plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine limiting defendant ISE’s expert testimony consistent with prior rulings regarding the scope of

U.S. Tax Court ruling underscores need to update and amend qualified plan documents to reflect changes in federal tax laws

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2011

A recent U.S. Tax Court case reminds employers of the importance of keeping qualified retirement plans updated for changes in the federal tax laws

Maintaining a California subsidiary may expose foreign corporations to service in California

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2011

A recent California Court of Appeals ruling greatly expands the exposure of foreign corporations to suit in California

Court stays attorney's fees determination pending appeal

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2011

Judge Kendall granted in part plaintiff Callprod's motion to stay determination regarding attorney's fees pending appeal of the underlying patent issues and the Court's determination as to whether the case was exceptional