We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 30

March edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2013

This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: A Second Circuit opinion finding that

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court concludes that recording ZIP code can serve as basis for class action even absent identity fraud

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 15 2013

Massachusetts' highest court ruled on March 11, 2013 that a consumer could bring a claim under a state statute based on a merchant's recording her

February edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 12 2013

This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: A Central District of California decision

California Supreme Court decides Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 does not apply to online transactions

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

Today the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Apple v. Superior Court (Krescent), holding that the Song-Beverly Credit Card

January edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2013

The Court contemporaneously released: (1) a proposed ESI Discovery Checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences and (2) a Model Stipulated Order regarding

California litigation report

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2013

As we head into the new year, this edition of the California Litigation Report describes some significant business cases that are likely to be decided by

California Litigation Report

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2012

The Fall 2012 edition of the California Litigation Report focuses on recent developments in class action law in both the federal and state courts in California, including several recent decisions addressing cy pres provisions in class action settlement agreements and the lessons from those cases

September edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2012

The underlying dispute involved a FOIA request made by plaintiffs for documents pertaining to “Secure Communities”a program established by the U.S

What happens when a relator steals patient data?

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2012

A federal district court in Ohio recently grappled with an issue that arises frequently in health care qui tam cases: what happens when a relator steals confidential health information to file an FCA action?

June edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2012

Judge Carter reviewed plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge Peck’s order under the deferential “clearly erroneous” standard and found no basis to overturn it