We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 886

District court holds plaintiff and plaintiff's attorneys jointly and severally liable for attorney's fees and costs after finding that attorneys knew of false affidavits filed with the Patent Office

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

After trial, HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. ("HTC") filed a motion seeking to recover attorney fees and costs from plaintiff's attorneys as

Court orders production of work product documents under crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege where defendants had falsely identified source code

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

In an earlier filed decision, the district court had previously found that Escort and its defense counsel had knowingly misled the plaintiff, Fleming

Patent owner: preponderance of evidence standard can never be met without expert testimony

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2015

In IPR2013-00357, Patent Owner Overland Storage, Inc. filed a request for rehearing of the final written decision holding that claims 1-11 of U.S

Court denies motion for extended deposition despite over 300 objections during deposition where Defendant failed to raise issue with objections during the deposition

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2015

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants requested that the court order a further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of one of the deponents, Mr

District court sanctions defendants for failing to agree to standard protective order

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion for entry of a standard protective order after the defendant would not agree to sign

Residential development in California: new Density Bonus Law makes new affordable housing difficult to build

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2015

Governor Brown signed into law on September 27, 2014, AB2222, which amends the State's Density Bonus Law ("DBL"), Gov't Code 65915, et seq. To

PTAB authorizes the filing of a motion for sanctions against inventor

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 6 2015

In IPR2014-00739 involving petitioner Shire Development LLC and patent owner LCS Group, LLC, the petitioner sought authorization to file a motion for

Smartflash v. Apple: district court excludes damage theory based on survey responses that were insufficient to show that the patented feature alone motivated survey respondents to purchase the accused devices

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 5 2015

Plaintiffs Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Limited (collectively "Smartflash") filed patent infringement actions against Apple, Inc

ADA defense lawyer: new ADA standards for website accessibility

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 1 2015

Since at least 2000, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has been advocating standardized website development and content to promote access to blind

District court declines to hear early motion for summary judgment on section 101 and postpones hearing until claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 31 2014

In the pending patent infringement action between Netflix and Rovi, Netflix filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking a ruling that Rovi's patents