We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 731

Declaratory judgment action dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction where contacts in jurisdiction occurred before, and were unrelated to, patent-in-suit

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

Digital Ally, Inc. ("Digital Ally") filed a declaratory judgment action pertaining to patent infringement against Utility Associates, Inc

New law allows mining operators to remedy compliance issues and retain AB 3098 List status

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2014

Mining companies are subject to myriad requirements under the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) and implementing regulations that can trip

Misstatements on application for in Forma Pauperis status results in dismissal of patent infringement action with prejudice

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2014

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action and also filed an application to proceed in pro per and In Forma Pauperis. The defendants file a motion

Apple v. Samsung: the Federal Circuit reverses the district court and sets new standards for obtaining permanent injunctions in patent infringement actions

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2014

As the ongoing war between Apple and Samsung continues, one of the key questions facing both parties is whether Apple can ultimately obtain permanent

Carnegie Mellon v. Marvell: district court enhances damages to $1.5 billion

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

After a jury returned a verdict against Marvell for patent infringement, Carnegie Mellon ("CMU") filed several motions, including for prejudgment

Stay pending resolution of Covered Business Method review denied where case was narrow and trial date was already set

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2014

Plaintiff SecureBuy, LLC ("SecureBuy") filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings pending resolution of a Covered Business Methods ("CBM") review at the

Quantum World v. Dell: after receiving numerous Daubert motions, district court lays down strict time limits for trial and rules that Daubert motion hearing time will count against time limits for party that brings and loses a Daubert challenge

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

In this patent infringement case, the district court received a number of motions to strike portions of expert reports and to exclude the testimony of

Clean Water Act update: EPA and Army Corps propose significant changes to the definition of "waters of the United States"

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

On March 25, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers announced the release of their proposed rule clarifying

Potter Voice v. Microsoft: Microsoft's request to exclude expert declaration for claim construction denied where Microsoft's arguments went to weight and credibility, not to admissibility

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

In this patent infringement action, Potter Voice submitted an expert declaration of David Klausner for the purpose of claim construction. Microsoft

Bowman v. California Coastal Commission: new California Court of Appeal decision holds that a collateral attack is no substitute for challenging a condition imposed upon the issuance of a quasi-judicial permit through a direct appeal

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2014

Sometimes in land use law, the most impactful court holdings come from the simplest of cases. That may be the situation with the new California Court