We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 577

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied without prejudice where inter partes review had not yet been granted

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Plaintiff Automatic Manufacturing Systems, Inc. ("AMS") manufactures and markets equipment used to print machine readable labels on glass microscope

Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging

Stay pending inter partes review denied because defendant waited too long to file the petition and court had dedicated resources to determining claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc. ("Universal Remote") filed a motion to stay a patent infringement action filed by Universal Electronics, Inc

California Governor's office announces new special TEA certification process for EB-5 immigrant investor financing in California

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

The EB-5 immigrant investor visa program allows non-U.S. persons to obtain United States permanent residency (green card) if they invest $1,000,000

Assignment agreement that failed to specifically address right to sue for past damages held insufficient on summary judgment; summary judgment granted to limit damages to period after patent was acquired

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Plaintiff Nano-Second Technology filed a patent infringement action against Dynaflex International, GForce Corporation, dba DFX Sports & Fitness

Community property rights of ex-wife impact standing of plaintiff to maintain patent infringement action

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

James R. Taylor ("Taylor") filed a patent infringement action against Taylor Made Inc. ("Taylor Made"). Taylor Made filed a motion to dismiss the

Administrative law judge at ITC grants motion for leave to file motions for summary determination out of time because complainant did not provide additional support for infringement contentions in expert report

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In this ITC proceeding, the Respondents filed a motion for leave to file motions for summary determination after the deadline for filing motions for

$50 million jury verdict over turned where plaintiff based damage theory on worldwide sales of accused products but only established that "some" of worldwide sales were infringing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

Promega Corporation ("Promega") filed a patent infringement action against Life Technologies Corporation ("Life Technologies"), among others, over

CEQA claimants be warned: new California Court of Appeal opinion holds that CEQA filing deadlines are mandatory and not subject to extension for good cause

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 25 2013

Statues of limitations issues frequently loom large in litigation under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and can confound litigants

Apple moves to limit claims asserted and court orders the plaintiff to reduce 247 claims to 70 claims over 10 patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

Plaintiff Unwired Planet ("UP") filed a patent infringement action against Apple asserting over 247 claims in ten different patents. Apple filed a