We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 805

IPR proceedings filed eight months apart is too long to permit joinder

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2014

In the Macronix International Co., Ltd. et al. v. Spansion LLC, the PTAB denied Petitioner's motion for joinder under Section 315(c). On November 8

Motion for summary judgment based on Apple License as defense denied where Apple products were not used to satisfy any claim element

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2014

In this patent infringement action between Personal Audio ("Personal Audio") and Togi Entertainment, Inc. ("Togi"), the defendants filed a motion for

PTAB's guidelines for foreign language depositions

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2014

In the Ariosa Diagnostics v. ISIS Innovation Limited inter partes review, the PTAB set for the guidelines for taking depositions in a foreign

Court rejects exhibit lists and objections that would "require a judge to shovel through steaming mounds of objections" and orders objections waived

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2014

As this patent infringement action headed to trial, the district court scolded both parties for their exhibit lists and, in particular, the

EB-5 visas and China “Retrogression” what’s it all about?

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • China, USA
  • -
  • September 7 2014

In the past, when China exceeded its 7 allocation of US Immigrant Investor Visas (EB-5 visas), Chinese applicants were permitted to take advantage

Withholding a Court's order from the USPTO in a co-pending reexamination may render a patent unenforceable in litigation

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2014

In Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronic North America Corporation, et al., the Philips Defendants moved for leave to amend their answer to add a

Sanctions awarded for "train wreck of a deposition" where witness was evasive and counsel made inappropriate objections

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 4 2014

In this patent infringement action between MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc. ("MAG") and BE Aerospace, Inc. ("BE"), MAG filed an ex parte motion as a

Prior denial of IPR petitions dooms litigation stay based on "second round" of petitions under the totality of the circumstances standard

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2014

In CTP Innovations, LLC v. Solo Printing, Case No. 1:14-cv-21499-UU, the Court denied, without prejudice, Defendant's motion to stay the litigation

Apple v. Samsung: Samsung's invalidity challenge to Apple's patents denied where legal theory was not disclosed until after trial

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2014

After the jury trial between Apple and Samsung, and shortly before the July 10, 2014 hearing on post-trial motions, Samsung requested leave to file

Court denies summary judgment motion as premature prior to Markman hearing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Pipeline Technologies Inc. ("Pipeline") filed a patent infringement action against Telog Instruments Inc. ("Telog"). Telog filed a motion for summary