We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
On May 12, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that a causation expert's opinion was unreliable based on his inability to quantify plaintiff's dose of benzene exposure (Pluck v. BP Oil Pipeline Co., 6th Cir., No. 09-4572, 51211
