Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 11-14 of 14
California Supreme Court decision on stock options allows restricted company stock plan which forfeits restricted shares once employee resigns or is terminated for good cause
- Baker & Hostetler LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 31 2009
In Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc., 47 Cal.4th 610 (2009), the California Supreme Court held that a voluntary bonus plan provision that effects a forfeiture if the employee was terminated for cause or voluntarily resigned within two years of purchasing company shares did not equate to an unlawful conversion of wages under California Labor Code 201, 202 and 219
California Court of Appeal decision awards civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 for violation of wage order
- Baker & Hostetler LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 26 2011
In Bright v. 99 Only Stores (case no. B220016), the California Court of Appeal held that a cashier could recover civil penalties when her employer failed to provide her suitable seating as required by Wage Order No.7-2001, subdivision 14 (requiring that employers provide employees with seating where the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats
Supreme court extends Fair Labor Standards Act anti-retaliation protection to employees who make oral complaints
- Baker & Hostetler LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 28 2011
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, ruled on Tuesday, March 22, 2011, that the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") protects employees who make oral complaints about a violation of the FLSA
U.S. Supreme Court narrows public-sector unions' ability to collect special assessments or extra union dues and raises doubts about "fair share fees"
- Baker & Hostetler LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 27 2012
The U.S. Supreme Court held Thursday, June 21, that the Service Employees International Union violated the First Amendment rights of California state employees when it imposed a special political assessment without first issuing a notice explaining the additional fees and giving nonunion members a chance to object
