We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 970

2007 changes and IRS-DOL guidance for defined contribution retirement plan sponsors

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2007

Calendar year 2007 is now in full swing -- and it has brought with it several changes to defined contribution retirement plans which were included in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA

EEOC's new retiree health rule

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2008

On December 26, 2007 the EEOC published a rule that permits employers to reduce benefits for retirees once they become eligible for Medicare

Watch out patent owner -- your licensee may have all the power now

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2007

The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., 05-608 (2007) held that a patent licensee was not required to violate or terminate its license agreement in order to file an action against the patent owner seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity or unenforceability of the patent(s) covered under the license

Permanent residents who undertake temporary foreign assignments should apply for re-entry permits - recent development regarding the application process

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2008

U.S. permanent residents sometimes are asked by their employers to undertake a temporary foreign assignment

West Virginia Supreme Court reverses trial court rulings, reinstates flood litigation cases

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2008

On June 26, 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a per curiam decision in the Mass Litigation Proceeding known as In Re: Flood Litigation (Civ. Action No. 02-C-797, Raleigh County Circuit Court), reversing separate rulings issued by Circuit Court Judges Recht and Hutchison that would have substantially limited plaintiffs' ability to go forward with such claims

Army Corps of Engineers issues new Regulatory Guidance on jurisdictional determinations

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2008

On June 26, 2008, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued Regulatory Guidance Letter 08-02, outlining the differences between an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (“Approved JD”) and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (“Preliminary JD”), and describing their use in the Clean Water Act 404 permitting process

The Employee Free Choice Act

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2007

On March 1, the House approved the Employee Free Choice Act, which is designed to amend the National Labor Relations Act

The latest on U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") audits of PERM labor certification applications

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2008

Attorneys from our firm attended the American Immigration Lawyer Association ("AILA") annual conference in June

Contraception exclusion in health plan not discriminatory says the Eighth Circuit

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2007

Less than two years ago, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska joined a trio of federal courts following the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's ("EEOC") Decision holding that a health plan's exclusion of prescription contraceptive drug coverage violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act ("PDA"

Allowing employee an unpaid leave of absence to correct deficiency in status consistent with Immigration Reform and Control Act

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2007

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Incalza v. Fendi North America, Inc., (filed on March 6, 2007) held that the Immigration Reform and Control Act ("IRCA") does not preempt California law that forbids firing an employee without good cause

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy