We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 274

Guidance on legality of employer policies regarding confidentiality during investigation of workplace misconduct

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Last year, the NLRB issued a controversial decision in Banner Health System, 358 N.L.R.B. No. 93 (2012), finding that an employer violated the NLRA

Court of appeals finds notice posting rule invalid; violates employer speech rights

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

The federal courts have dealt the NLRB's notice posting rule another setback. In a ruling Tuesday, the court of appeals in Washington, D.C., the same

Court of Appeals "baffled" by NLRB's finding of unlawful union remark by employer's President

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2013

Recently, the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals reigned in a union-friendly NLRB decision involving comments made during a union

President Obama announces NLRB nominations

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2013

President Obama announced his intention today to nominate three individuals to the NLRB. The President's action comes at a time when the authority of

"FELA is a very favorable statute for railroad employees"

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

In fact, it is so favorable that the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is enough to carry the day. Consider Clements v. Norfolk Southern. Plaintiff

Court overturns NLRB decision regarding failure to provide information during bargaining

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

During labor negotiations, an employer is obligated to provide certain information to the union. When that information implicates the employer's

AGC memorandum contains answers to questions from practitioners

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

Earlier this year, the Acting General Counsel met with the Practice and Procedure Committee of the American Bar Association's Labor and Employment

OFCCP issues new directive for analyzing pay discrimination claims for use by the federal contracting community

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2013

Recently, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) officially withdrew the Bush-era guidance regarding pay discrimination. In its

NLRB announces appeal of recess appointments decision

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2013

Earlier this afternoon, the NLRB announced that it will appeal the Noel Canning decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. Noel Canning is the case from the

U.S. District Court dismisses $10 million FCA suit

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. recently granted a motion to dismiss qui tam claims from two