We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 390

No minimum wage increase for Minnesota in 2013

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Minnesota Legislature's session ended on May 20, 2012, without any increase in the state minimum wage. Earlier this year, DFL legislators

The “box” will be banned in Minnesota

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

The Minnesota Legislature passed "ban the box" legislation, and Governor Mark Dayton signed it into law. The law will take effect on January 1, 2014

Five, six, or seven opinions in Alice Corp.: little agreement on 101

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Circuit judges continue to differ regarding the test for patent subject-matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. The en banc decision in CLS

What employers need to know about same-sex marriage in Minnesota

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

On May 14, 2013, Governor Mark Dayton signed legislation making Minnesota the 12th state to recognize same-sex marriage. The new law will take effect

Impairments and health professionals: what’s an employer to do?

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Health professionals, including physicians, dentists, nurses, paramedics, pharmacists, psychologists and social workers, are far from immune from

Two recent U.S. cases on lost profits

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

The remedy of lost profits has always seemed to me to be, conceptually, the simplest of the various damages remedies. You calculate how many

Preclusive effect of TTAB decisions: always, sometimes, or never?

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

Last week a divided Eighth Circuit panel affirmed a district court's conclusion that a TTAB decision would not be given preclusive effect in B&B

Remedies for the infringement of standard essential patents subject to a FRAND commitment

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Following up my posts on Judge Robart's opinion in Microsoft v. Motorola and on the European Commission's issuance of a Statement of Objections to

Remember to use new I-9 forms starting May 7, 2013

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

The federal government has released new I-9 forms that are required to be used by all employers beginning tomorrow, on May 7, 2013. The new forms

Some initial reactions to Judge Robart’s opinion in Microsoft v. Motorola

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

Late last week Judge James Robart issued his long-awaiting findings and fact and conclusions of law on the issue of RAND royalties in Microsoft Corp