We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

HP Inkjet Printer Litigation: fee award fails to comply with provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2013

In In re: HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 2013 DJDAR 6149 (2013) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the approval of an attorney's fee award

Court interprets settlement agreement to allow for fee recovery

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2013

In Khavarian Enterprises Inc. v. Commline Inc.,2013 DJDAR 6107 (2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District overruled the

Crowdsourced workers: are they employees or independent contractors?

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2013

What happens when modern innovations in the workforce (made possible by the advent of the internet) collide with traditional concepts of employment

California Supreme Court allows "continuous accrual" doctrine to avoid statute of limitations for "unfair" UCL claim

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

Seeking to clarify the extent to which the four-year statute of limitations applies to claims under the Unfair Competition Law, Business &

There can only be one prevailing party under Civil Code Section 1717

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2012

In Frog Creek Partners LLC v. Vance Brown Inc., 2012 DJDAR 6905 (2012), the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District decided a novel prevailing party case under Civil Code Section 1717

California court dismisses ucl claim over fiji water

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 30 2011

Sometimes a green drop is just a green drop

Assignee may pursue claim for indemnification for unreimbursed counsel fees

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2011

In Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc. v Ralph M. Parson Service Co., 2011 DJDAR 1193 (2011), the Fourth District Court of Appeal decided an interesting contract indemnity case dealing with a fee award

Attorney fee award is appropriate based on successful forum non conveniens motion

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 15 2010

The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District recently decided a novel fee question

California Supreme Court again confirms a penalty is not restitution under the UCL

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 21 2010

Recently, we reported on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. Superior Court (National Western Life Insurance Company), wherein the Court confirmed that the only monetary remedy available under the Unfair Competition Law, Business & Professions Code section 17200 (the “UCL”) is restitution, and that a claim for treble damages is not restitution, nor is the nature of restitution comparable to a penalty

Finding that an anti-SLAPP motion is frivolous justifies fee award

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 26 2010

In Baharian-Mehr v. Glenn Smith, et. al. 2010 DJDAR 15946 (2010) the Fourth District of the California Court of Appeal, held that the special motion to strike procedure set forth in CCP 425.16 was not applicable to a business dispute