We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

California Supreme Court allows "continuous accrual" doctrine to avoid statute of limitations for "unfair" UCL claim

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

Seeking to clarify the extent to which the four-year statute of limitations applies to claims under the Unfair Competition Law, Business &

California court dismisses ucl claim over fiji water

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 30 2011

Sometimes a green drop is just a green drop

California Supreme Court again confirms a penalty is not restitution under the UCL

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 21 2010

Recently, we reported on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. Superior Court (National Western Life Insurance Company), wherein the Court confirmed that the only monetary remedy available under the Unfair Competition Law, Business & Professions Code section 17200 (the “UCL”) is restitution, and that a claim for treble damages is not restitution, nor is the nature of restitution comparable to a penalty

Unfair Competition Law cases still occupy numerous spaces on the California Supreme Court's docket

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2010

In November 2004, the voters of California passed Proposition 64, which was intended to rein in certain abuses in and bring some clarity to the Unfair Competition Law, California Business & Professions Code sections 17200 et. seq. (“the UCL”