Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Insurer's denial of business interruption claim, since there was no "accidental direct physical loss," affirmed by California Court of Appeal
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 25 2010
On August 4, 2010, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed a summary judgment in favor of State Farm in connection with the insurer’s denial of a claim under a first party business interruption policy (MRI Healthcare Center v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Award of attorney fees under the automobile sale finance act upheld by court of appeal
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 20 2010
In Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co., D054369 (July 15, 2010), the Fourth Appellate District upheld the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiff class representative under the Automobile Sale Finance Act (“ASFA”), and denied costs to defendant in its claim under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 998
For better or for worse, court finds joint 998 offer to husband and wife sufficient basis for expert witness fees and costs award
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 1 2012
In Farag v. ArvinMeritor Inc., 2012 DJDAR 5206 (April 24, 20120), the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed a post-judgment order denying plaintiffs’ motion to tax expert witness costs
District court doesn't 'like' Facebook in fee award decision
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 26 2012
In Cohen v. Facebook, Inc., (April 10, 2012), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied defendant’s request for attorneys fees under a statutory fee-shifting provision
Current Search
- Firm Name - Barger & Wolen LLP
- Author - Tino X. Do
- Workarea - Litigation