Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 46

Insurance disputes held to be not subject to arbitration

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
April 19 2013

The Washington State Supreme Court upheld the lower court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration of an insurance coverage dispute on grounds that

Eleventh Circuit reverses decision to exclude plaintiff’s experts

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
April 19 2013

In United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Whirlpool Corp., 704 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2013) (No. 11-15011), the plaintiff insurer brought this appeal from the

Insurer’s payment of defense fees did not create joint client relationship

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
April 19 2013

In CAMICO Mutual Insurance Co. v. Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP,No. 11-4753, (E.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2013), the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held

Superintendent of insurance may assert privilege on behalf of liquidating insurer

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
April 19 2013

In Wallis v. Centennial Insurance Co., No. 08-cv-2558 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013), Magistrate Judge Allison Claire of the Eastern District of California

Insurer unable to step into CERCLA shoes of insured

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 28 2013

A recent Ninth Circuit decision limited the ability of an insurer to seek CERCLA contribution andor cost recovery from potentially responsible

Is your organization adequately protected against liability under the new HIPAA “privacy” regulationsinsurance coverage considerations

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 25 2013

On January 17, 2013, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced important modifications to the Health Insurance Portability and

Second Circuit finds “robbery” is ambiguous in crime policy, awards coverage

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 13 2013

In VAM Check Cashing Corp. v. Federal Insurance Co., 699 F.3d 727 (2d Cir. 2012) (No. 11-2644), the Second Circuit confirmed that ambiguities are

Class suit against mutual insurance company does not implicate internal affairs

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 13 2013

CAFA contains an "internal affairs" exception: class actions may not be removed where they arise by virtue of the laws of the State in which the

Insureroutside counsel communications not privileged in bad faith action

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 13 2013

In Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., No. 11-cv-3111 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012), applying Georgia law, the court held that communications

Insurer sues law firm over FCA sanctions coverage

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
December 31 2012

Westfield Insurance Co. launched a lawsuit against Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP in Indiana federal court claiming its policies do not cover the

next >

Search results

Insurance disputes held to be not subject to arbitration

Eleventh Circuit reverses decision to exclude plaintiff’s experts

Insurer’s payment of defense fees did not create joint client relationship

Superintendent of insurance may assert privilege on behalf of liquidating insurer

Insurer unable to step into CERCLA shoes of insured

Is your organization adequately protected against liability under the new HIPAA “privacy” regulationsinsurance coverage considerations

Second Circuit finds “robbery” is ambiguous in crime policy, awards coverage

Class suit against mutual insurance company does not implicate internal affairs

Insureroutside counsel communications not privileged in bad faith action

Insurer sues law firm over FCA sanctions coverage

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea